Item: Godzilla Collection
Language: en-US
Type of Problem: Incorrect_content
Extra Details: Please Add Kong: Skull Island (2017) To the Movie Set Collection
Can't find a movie or TV show? Login to create it.
Want to rate or add this item to a list?
Not a member?
Reply by Banana
on April 2, 2021 at 5:50 PM
Please read the Collection guidelines in the Contribution Bible. Kong: Skull Island is not a sequel to Godzilla.
Reply by jogi1986
on September 4, 2021 at 4:00 AM
Please Add Kong: Skull Island tho the MonsterVerse Collection. This Film is a Part of them. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kong:_Skull_Island https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MonsterVerse
Reply by superboy97
on September 4, 2021 at 4:15 AM
This is not the Monsterverse collection, but the Godzilla collection. And, as answered above by @banana_girl , "Kong: Skull Island" isn't a sequel to Godzilla.
I invite you to read our collection rules.
Reply by jogi1986
on January 18, 2022 at 7:16 AM
please, add Skull Island to the Godzilla Collection. This Movie is a Part of them. Or make a Monsterverse Collection. Kong Skull Island is definitely a part of this collection, i say only "Monarch"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MonsterVerse https://godzilla.fandom.com/wiki/Skull_Island_(MonsterVerse) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kong:_Skull_Island
Reply by binpls
on September 23, 2023 at 8:38 AM
@superboy97 I agree that Kong: Skull Island is not a sequel to Godzilla, however Godzilla vs. Kong is a sequel to both Kong: Skull Island & Godzilla: King of the Monsters. How do you decide which movie it gets grouped into?
Reply by Jim Stark
on September 23, 2023 at 12:12 PM
Well, here https://www.themoviedb.org/collection/86486-spy-kids-collection/discuss/650e8fdbf29d6600e25770b5 the film which is not a sequel to previous films is considered valid to be added to a collection. Why does the Skull Island situation have to be different?
Reply by ankurmittal1989
on January 27, 2024 at 1:56 PM
That is why you need to allow movies to be part of multiple collections as movies can be connected and then we can get a sequel for both together
Reply by DarkRay
on March 16, 2024 at 10:17 AM
That's the problem, it's not the godzilla collection, it's the monsterverse collection, and the last 2 godzilla and kong movies are part of the monsterverse. The 2 godzilla movies and the kong movie are prequels to "Godzilla vs. Kong" and "Godzilla and Kong: New empire".
The movies can't be more than one collection, and making a collection of only godzilla is a mistake, at least until the option to group movies by universes is implemented. In all the movies there is Monarch, they are from the same universe, and the 2 lines of kong and godzilla movies have ended up joining in 2 final movies.
Reply by GrimReaper76
on May 13, 2024 at 7:45 AM
Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire should be a part of Godzilla Collection and not Kong Collection, as it is direct sequel to 2021 Godzilla vs. Kong.
Ideally, there'd be only a single MonsterVerse collection with both of those collections combined, as said:
Reply by jsonting
on May 23, 2024 at 3:06 PM
Wow.. I guess you must be asleep while watching the movie.. or if you even watch it. You guys just can’t comprehend the idea of collection can you?
I cringe when I see how you guys did the same to DC universe and marvel universe. Geez…. Wake up you guys
Reply by Banana
on May 23, 2024 at 3:31 PM
The plan has always been to combine everything under a MonsterVerse UNIVERSE when the feature is released. Just like we're gonna do for the DC or Marvel movies. I don't know how many times we can repeat that collections were created to group sequels together, and it's only the first step in grouping items.
Reply by WoodenDuke
on November 17, 2024 at 10:20 AM
Sorry to open this again... But isn't that really a logical error in this case?
If they had introduced Kong and Godzilla separately in the first film and then continued with Kong vs Godzilla in the second film, it would be a collection. Now they first introduced Godzilla in one film, then introduced Kong in the second film, and then brought them both together in the third film. And so it's no longer a collection?
With Marvel or DC it's something different, it doesn't follow a general timeline and is a loose bundle. But in my opinion this collection doesn't behave that way.
If I read the rules correctly, this should apply here: “Series of standalone films and mixed series marketed as actual sequels are also permitted as collections. These sequels are usually numbered and have a similar theme and/or universe.”
Unfortunately I don't understand that. Or should I just understand this as a merging of two film series? I just want this to be clear to myself so that I can classify it better in the future.