I've heard of actors being described as "wooden" but it usually means that had a moment or two of delivering a line that sounded genuine. I don't think this guy delivered a single line in the entire film that didn't sound wooden. I've seen better acting in sitcoms and soaps. I guess after the first "Cut! OK, Stephen can we try that again but this time with more, you know, feeling? " Cronenberg said, "Ah screw it. We're on a tight budget. Let's just power through. " I think even Sofia Coppola's acting in The Godfather Part III might have been better. As bad as his acting was, it still didn't ruin the film for me. Patrick McGoohan came off as though he didn't want to be there. Not sure if he was going for a particular style but the way he uttered his lines it was as though he was thinking, " SIGH, fine. I'll say these ridiculous lines. Is it quitting time yet? Where's my paycheck. "
Scanners (1981) - 7 outta 10 stars
Can't find a movie or TV show? Login to create it.
Want to rate or add this item to a list?
Not a member?
Reply by bratface
on May 15, 2022 at 6:36 AM
Here is one bit of trivia from that site that shall not be named:
"David Cronenberg once called this the most frustrating film he'd ever made. The film was rushed through production - filming had to begin without a finished script and end within roughly two months so the financing would qualify as a tax write-off, forcing Cronenberg to write and shoot at the same time. Cronenberg also cited difficulty with and antagonism between the leads, particularly Patrick McGoohan and Jennifer O'Neill."
And if you want to read more:
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0081455/trivia
Reply by movie_nazi
on May 15, 2022 at 7:20 AM
It totally makes sense. You can actually feel it whilst watching the film. I didn't pick it up as much as with O'Neill. Probably because she didn't have as many scenes as McGoohan but the tension definitely comes through. I'd say Cronenberg did an excellent job if he was writing and shooting at the same time.
Reply by bratface
on May 15, 2022 at 7:55 AM
I've never seen it (not into gore).
Reply by movie_nazi
on May 15, 2022 at 8:52 AM
Yeah, I guess it is kinda gory but the dated special effects make it seem not so bad. But I guess you can say a lot of Cronenberg's films have some sort of gross out factor to them.
Reply by bratface
on May 15, 2022 at 9:33 AM
That's one of the main reasons I do not like 'modern' horror/slasher movies. They do not scare me but I feel every blow. It's like lactic acid rushing through my body. I like horror films to be suspenseful. Chasing someone through the woods, a house, etc. with a chainsaw, knife, or an ax isn't scary.
Reply by tmdb53400018
on May 17, 2022 at 6:32 AM
I do feel with rewatches that this is one of Cronenberg's lesser efforts. Thanks for the info.
However, the exploding head effect (and some others I recall) seem to look just as effective today as they were in the eighties....