@joshgallet said:

So I was thinking back to the ep and how Kresteva was trying to implicate Diane by referencing her old law firm's Fed ID number on the Schtup List.

But - how would that hold water since Diane lost all her $ in the same scheme? Why would she have invested money with someone who she was also helping in the same scheme? To me that would have been an open and shut argument.

I think you make a good point here! I thought about this yesterday and tried to find an explanation as to why Diane would do this - and I can't come up with one. I'll try to watch the episode again this weekend, maybe it gets clearer during a second watch? Because I don't really understand what Henry Rindell was trying to do to blame Diane for what happened? Did he imply that Diane helped him to pursue/convince more people from her firm to invest into his fund? Or did he imply that it was her scheme? I didn't really understand this part of the episode very good ... :-(

Also, another thing I didn't understand: How did Mike Kresteva get the information that those 2 litigation financiers, Tom and Jerry, did invest more money once they knew of having a better chance to win this police brutality case from episode 1? I mean, he served those 2 guys for a purpose, but how did he dig up this information about them and their connection to Diane's old firm with this unbelievably long name?

Questions, questions, questions ...

Best wishes,

janar

"Love [...] is the most incredible gift to give and to receive as a human being." - Ellen Page