OK I just binge watched the whole series and the last episode (Endgame) killed me.
I'm sorry but Chakotay and 7-of-9? That makes no sense.
Chakotay and Janeway spend 6 and a half years together, having dinner having breakfast being Mom and Dad to the crew. I truly imagined a scene on Earth where they say "Well, we're no longer Captain and First Officer" and fall into each other.
But no. Instead we have a pic-nic.
On the other hand 7-of-9. The Doctor has professed his love at least once in public. Harry Kim has had some romantic interests. Hell! Even Tuvok had a certain logical affinity to her. All of these are thrown out the door.
As an aside I thought a hook-up with Data would have been excellent. Those wiley nana-probes.
I just picture a bunch of writers with no interest the show just saying "yeah, that'll do it let's have lunch."
Can't find a movie or TV show? Login to create it.
Want to rate or add this item to a list?
Not a member?
Reply by Tim-Buktu
on February 7, 2018 at 12:20 AM
I am very tolerant of Star Trek. I actually try to make an effort to find the good parts of bad episodes.
I like dolphins but I'm sticking with my big giant brain.
I don't agree with the reviewer. I was amazed that he was so savage.
Now that one was funny. I really wanted Chaotica to get hold of a mobile emitter.
Interesting point. In "The Making of Star Trek", warp 1 is defined as the speed of light, warp 2 is 2x2x2 the speed of light, warp 3 is 3x3x3 the speed of light. ( I didn't make this up.) But do you time travel just by going faster than the speed of light?
In "Turnabout Intruder" The evil Doctor Janice Lester uses alien technology to swap bodies with Kirk.
It's an interesting story aside from the over acting. I recommend it as watching in a womens studies class just to show girls that Yeah believe it or not that was societys view of women.
Some Quotes:
Scott: Doctor, I've seen the captain feverish, sick, drunk, delirious, terrified, overjoyed, boiling mad... but up to now, I have never seen him red-faced with hysteria.
Dr. Janice Lester: I hoped I wouldn't see you again.
Captain James T. Kirk: I don't blame you.
Dr. Janice Lester: The year we were together at Starfleet is the only time in my life I was alive.
Captain James T. Kirk: I never stopped you from going on with your space work.
Dr. Janice Lester: Your world of starship captains doesn't admit women. It isn't fair.
Captain James T. Kirk: No, it isn't, and you punished and tortured me because of it.
Dr. Janice Lester: I loved you. We could have roamed among the stars.
Captain James T. Kirk: We'd have killed each other.
Dr. Janice Lester: It might have been better.
[last lines of the series]
Captain James T. Kirk: I didn't want to destroy her.
Mr. Spock: I'm sure we all understand that, Captain.
Captain James T. Kirk: Her life could have been as rich as any woman's, if only... if only...
A time traveler may need to change location in order to achieve time travel, but thy are still two different concepts. (Marty Mc Fly comes to mind.)
This is what I like to think of as "The writers morality syndrome". If you go back in time and change the past will it change your current state of being. Some writers take this to extremes, as in "oh no! I bent a blade of grass! the future is doomed!" to "It doesn't matter what you do in the past, history will correct itself"
https://youtu.be/RSB3bRTYnLw
I maintain that it depends on how big the action is.
https://youtu.be/IX33Diwrv3A?list=PLKKYUOEIIsSBBUrSFastXkcvRwU9BSJw2
Captain Yelland: If the United States falls under attack our job is to defend her in the past, present and future.
Lasky: And after that?
Captain Yelland: After that, we take our orders from the Commander in Chief of the United States Armed Forces.
Lasky: Franklin Delano Roosevelt?
I'm pretty sure I saw that. Didn't it end with an infinite number of layers?
For the first 25 years it was.
Well, where would be the fun of going to a happy dimension? Does evil Ryker have a beard?
I could have picked anywhere that people seem behind the times. I chose the Amish because they are that way by choice.
Reply by Tim-Buktu
on February 8, 2018 at 8:30 AM
DANG! For some reason I was not notified of your response. I blame the Time Lords.
This brings up an issue that annoys me. The Doctor is a hologram. Yet he is treated as a member of the crew. What about those countless holograms created on the holodecks? Can Leonardo DaVinci not have a full life in the 24th century?
OK............I had to consult my spirit guide Wild Turkey.
Well, that's just Quantum Leap all over again.
FDR? The commander in chief of the United States Armed Forces? https://youtu.be/lK8gYGg0dkE
One wouldn't, but two might
In TOS the "evil" Spock had a goatee. This has become a trope that the evil version of a person has a goatee/beard. Since the "good" Ryker has a beard, what does the evil Ryker have?
Well, That's a negative view of people!
Reply by Tim-Buktu
on February 9, 2018 at 6:40 AM
I can't buy that argument. The DaVinci character was created by Janeway using her perspective on what he would be like. There would be no temporal problems any more than if someone believed he was DaVinci.
When the Doctor first appeared, he was little more than a glorified first aid kit. The more he was activated, the more his personality (such as it is) grew. Why not DaVinci. And to go further, what about those countless other holograms? Do we not count them just because they're not famous?
I'm sure the Federation has am equivalence to the ACLU. When will they get involved? Voyager does have an option. They found a dimension where the people were all holograms. Why not send them there?
A final thought: https://youtu.be/vZ7CGBM4JJo
I have no problem with space aliens. They've been around since at least 1952. They've never caused any problems that I know of. They're not trying to shove their religion down our throats or take our jobs or drive around playing their loud space "music" and they've got the good sense to stay in their own neighborhoods. I just wish all aliens were like them.
Reply by Tim-Buktu
on February 9, 2018 at 11:30 AM
I can easily make a comparison with the differences between a child who is taught to be socially active and one who is kept in his room. Does giving Leo more opportunities make him "better" than the bartender at Tom Paris's French tavern? If time is an issue, consider Fairhaven that was left running non-stop with many crew members stopping by.
Barkley had many problems and he used the holodecks to escape. If he didn't have that I'm sure he would have found something else.
Nonsense. DaVinci is a smart man who loves learning. He would pick up on the 24th century pretty quickly. Consider ST:TNG Times Arrow, where Mark Twain visits the future:
https://youtu.be/9yzjk-m2vtc
I think that the key point is whether or not artificial intelligence is "alive" Are Data and the Doctor alive or do they just give that appearance. And if they are, at what point did that happen? Are philosophical/religious arguments going on? "AI is alive at the moment of programming! HALELUJA!"
https://youtu.be/pcT8fJ9WcHQ
https://youtu.be/jq5mCWZUF5U
ooops. I meant 1947
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roswell_UFO_incident
https://youtu.be/A-l9-dI4k60
Reply by Tim-Buktu
on February 9, 2018 at 10:55 PM
I have no memory of that happening. Are you sure it was "Fairhaven"?
I'm pretty sure that was "The Q and the Grey", not a holodecks episode.
Well yes but it was repaired by the end. The holos even accepted the crew for who they were.
Just the reverse. He was bitter and cynical until his conversation with Troy. (Typical Star Trek: one conversation changes a persons lifelong worldview.)
I see his problems as not having time travel capabilities.
You're thinking of Copernicus (or Galileo, I forget). Leo died quite comfortably in a French castle being tended by the king.
There has been so much put out about Roswell, most of it contradictory, that I'm willing to wait for the aliens to give us their side of the story.
Are you thinking of this?:
https://youtu.be/sl3HJGMFZp8
Cool links thanks
Reply by Tim-Buktu
on February 11, 2018 at 11:17 AM
I've seen that. Pretty much everybody agrees that it's fake. They even made fun of it on X-Files (couldn't find a link).
Was this part of the show? It sound more like fan fiction to me.
To be fair, there's not a lot of difference between the civil war South and Victorian England.
I've never been a Janeway fan. I probably just skimmed those episodes.
https://youtu.be/cksoOOh47cQ
I never saw Firefly as a western. It just made sense to dress that way. It's not like:
https://youtu.be/hU4lTEVa9vA
The fans loved the show. It was the studio that hated it.
It could have been fun watching them upstage each other in sickbay.
That and she could read his mind.
Yeah but good writing comes from unhappy people. What would Twain write about?
https://youtu.be/bPBzj90Su8A
https://youtu.be/5ufh8fctr3o
Reply by Tim-Buktu
on February 11, 2018 at 9:42 PM
Well, like I said, I'm not a fan of Janeway. I probably fast forwarded past her part of the show.
Reply by Tim-Buktu
on February 12, 2018 at 5:55 AM
Thanks for the links.
First off, Voyager is an **ensemble **show. Janeway may be captain, but the show as a show can get by without her.
How I do it. And to be clear, I had all seven seasons on loan and had to return them.
As I began watching, I got interested in the storylines of some characters and not others. If Janeway was on one of her many soul searching monologues, I would skip ahead to The Doctor and Seven dancing or Tom and BeLanna arguing/making up. Why would I watch this tedious woman feel sorry for herself? If on the other hand, it looks like she is advancing the plot then I can move back to the start of the scene. In this method, I like John Rhys-Davies. When I saw him on screen I would return to the beginning of the scene. And I'm not a purist about Janeway . I liked watching her dealing with Q. I liked her as Queen of the Spider People. She had her moments. So, it's very conceivable that I bypassed her screwing up Fairhaven for her own personal pleasure without giving it much thought (much like she did with Michael Sullivan).
Reply by Maria Kelly
on February 13, 2018 at 11:40 AM
What wreaked Voyager for me is when it became Star Trek : Seven of Nine.
Reply by Tim-Buktu
on February 13, 2018 at 10:58 PM
For me, the more I think about it, it's all of those annoying plot holes that they just let pass. TOS had the excuse that recording devices didn't exist but by the time of Voyager they KNEW that Trekies would comb the stories.
In one episode, they had to hide all of their telepaths. (Including two Betazoids)
Later in another episode Janeway complains:" What I wouldn't give to have a Betazoid on board."
And that's just me remembering. Just think if somebody did some real research.
Reply by Tim-Buktu
on February 14, 2018 at 2:30 AM
I never said Kate Mulgrew was a bad actress. I said I didn't Like Janeway. Even her older self described her as arrogant.
https://youtu.be/M3CT_qVzL84
People are always falling in love with inanimate objects: Children with their stuffed toys, Teenaged boys with their cars, Japanese business men with their....ah..hem. So I can easily see people falling in love with a holodecks character. At least it gives ships counselors something to do.
https://youtu.be/7-SVvtxHJGU
In the 24th century, the United States doesn't exist. If it did, then Leo wouldn't be a citizen. However, historically, John Kennedy (as the first Catholic president) had to reassure voters that he took his orders from the U.S. Constitution not the Pope.
There is a simple solution. Simply declare all holograms, artificial life etc. to be machines very clever and adaptive machines grant you but machines never the less.
https://youtu.be/SRcKt4PP0yM
Reply by Tim-Buktu
on February 14, 2018 at 7:28 AM
You might want to have your spell check looked into.
I'm not about to defend Kirk or Seven on the subject of arrogance. Seven had the excuse of being Borg at least.
Janeway seems to want it both ways: warm and compassionate on one occasion and tough as nails the next. I believe that ,once again it's the fault of poor writing.
I don't think it was ever shown. But then again I imagine that there were many positions that weren't shown.
Ah but you're thinking of the REAL Leo. In Star Trek land. There have been plenty of examples of people brought from the past who adjust with amazing ease.
(can't find the examples I'm thinking of)
I thought that was my point.
You live in a very frightening universe. A being is considered "human" only if he EARNS it?
DaVinci studied the human race his whole life. Why would his hologram not do the same?
By that logic, are people who are arrogant not human?
You do realize that you are also describing the Doctor.
Reply by Maria Kelly
on February 14, 2018 at 9:27 AM
Well I'm considered arrogant but I did pass my annual "yep, she's human" exam last week. :-)
Reply by Tim-Buktu
on February 14, 2018 at 10:35 AM
After considering the many people I know that are arrogant, maybe Invidia is on to something. Just think of how empty Washington and Hollywood would be.
Reply by Tim-Buktu
on February 14, 2018 at 10:50 PM
No offense was intended. Up until now I saw very few misspellings. So I was surprised.
Gender studies in this era of Harvey Weinstein is a very delicate subject that I stay away from. But arrogance is not the same as a strong moral compass.
On leadership:
https://youtu.be/6SOTBHAcLV4
A female leader with a strong moral compass:
https://youtu.be/RaSmassvv4w
https://youtu.be/sGRxM1I-M_0
Sure if you say so. My opinion is that it could have been written better. To me it felt like oil and water.
Well this is a perfect example of downloading information without giving it time to assimilate. Personally I would rather have a cup of coffee with Neelix.
Here's one:
https://youtu.be/ui6g23ygov8
But you are assuming that because a person is born in a certain era they are destined to remain in that mind set. I completely disagree, especially with a mind like DaVincis. In "Concerning Flight", wasn't DaVinci working in a 24th century lab?
JANEWAY also explains to LEO how if she tried to explain to him the kind of ADVANCED TRANSPORTER TECHNOLOGY she used in front of him it would be like trying to explain it to a SPARROW that didn't have a brain developed enough to comprehend it or what she was saying about it to it.
Another example of Janeways arrogance.
I assumed it was Janeway herself backed up by historical records. Do you think she programmed him to be less intelligent?
But we do know that he thinks he's IN AMERICA when he's NOT, and JANEWAY also explains how he needs to go back to EUROPE (which is the HOLODECK) after the PIRATES STEAL him and used him as a way to MAKE WEAPONS for them (by using THE DOC's EMITTER which they'd also STOLEN).
Leo can only make decisions based on the information he has. If someone sat him down and explained the situation, I'm sure they'd find him a pretty quick study.
We are treading on dangerous ground here. We are asking at what moment does a collection of "stuff" become human. The Doctor, you say, has Earned the right to be human. But how did he get that opportunity? By interacting with humans? So what was the town of Fairhaven doing? Why haven't they given the same opportunity to Leo?
In defense of Seven her arrogance is based on her Borg heritage, the same as many cultures today.