Discuss Raw

I don't think anyone should retire The Undetaker, but if someone should, it should be Ted DiBiase Jr. I know he's retired himself, but I think it would make sense because his father introduced The Undertaker when he first debuted. What does everyone think?

5 replies (on page 1 of 1)

Jump to last post

I think he should beat the vest off of Roman then ride into the sunset

Cena. I know people will say he has nothing to gain from it, however itโ€™s less about who has what to gain and more about who is worthy of the honour. Rock had nothing to gain from retiring Austin. Michaels had nothing to gain from retiring Flair. Taker had nothing to gain from retiring Michaels. Legends kills legends.

That said, I do believe Reigns will be retiring Taker this year.

In my own fantasy scenario, The Undertaker and Bray Wyatt wouldn't have squared off until the main event of this year's Wrestlemania, in a match set up by the Undertaker winning the Royal Rumble in his homestate of Texas and Bray winning the title the following month at Elimination Chamber. And then in a most unexpected outcome, Taker puts over Bray and passes the torch, officially christening him as The New Face of Fear.

If the Streak had still be intact, that would have been even better.

@Lockard The GOAT said:

In my own fantasy scenario, The Undertaker and Bray Wyatt wouldn't have squared off until the main event of this year's Wrestlemania, in a match set up by the Undertaker winning the Royal Rumble in his homestate of Texas and Bray winning the title the following month at Elimination Chamber. And then in a most unexpected outcome, Taker puts over Bray and passes the torch, officially christening him as The New Face of Fear.

If the Streak had still be intact, that would have been even better.

I think a lot of people wouldn't have minded this. That being said, I don't think they'll give the victory to Reigns just to try and get him over. I think that's akin to spitting on someone's legacy just for the sake of it. If they want Reigns to be the babyface of the company it would be a terrible way to do it.

@simian_ninja said:

@Lockard The GOAT said:

In my own fantasy scenario, The Undertaker and Bray Wyatt wouldn't have squared off until the main event of this year's Wrestlemania, in a match set up by the Undertaker winning the Royal Rumble in his homestate of Texas and Bray winning the title the following month at Elimination Chamber. And then in a most unexpected outcome, Taker puts over Bray and passes the torch, officially christening him as The New Face of Fear.

If the Streak had still be intact, that would have been even better.

I think a lot of people wouldn't have minded this. That being said, I don't think they'll give the victory to Reigns just to try and get him over. I think that's akin to spitting on someone's legacy just for the sake of it. If they want Reigns to be the babyface of the company it would be a terrible way to do it.

They'll probably have Taker defeat Reigns (Cena-lite) this year and then have Cena retire The Dead Man himself at 34 (although kind of depressing for Taker to bow out in the same building he lost his illustrious streak in, albeit fitting.)

Can't find a movie or TV show? Login to create it.

Global

s focus the search bar
p open profile menu
esc close an open window
? open keyboard shortcut window

On media pages

b go back (or to parent when applicable)
e go to edit page

On TV season pages

(right arrow) go to next season
(left arrow) go to previous season

On TV episode pages

(right arrow) go to next episode
(left arrow) go to previous episode

On all image pages

a open add image window

On all edit pages

t open translation selector
ctrl+ s submit form

On discussion pages

n create new discussion
w toggle watching status
p toggle public/private
c toggle close/open
a open activity
r reply to discussion
l go to last reply
ctrl+ enter submit your message
(right arrow) next page
(left arrow) previous page

Settings

Want to rate or add this item to a list?

Login