Discuss Raw

www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXir_Udeqg8

During the WrestleCon 2017 Kickoff Party in Orlando last week, Matt Striker moderated a panel with Jim Ross, Sting and Ric Flair. Sting was asked if they missed out by WWE never booking Sting vs. The Undertaker while they were both actively wrestling. Sting didn't agree, because if you look at their careers they didn't miss out on anything. Flair praised the matches Sting had with Triple H and Seth Rollins. Flair joked that while Sting had a "really sweet deal" with TNA, he went nearly half an hour with Triple H and "fought off the opposition." He said that showed what kind of athlete and how great of a wrestler he was.

What does everyone think?

2 replies (on page 1 of 1)

Jump to last post

It was a missed opportunity. Wrestling is a business. The objective is to make money. If there’s money to be made, and you aren’t making it, you’ve missed an opportunity.

Having illustrious careers in spite of never facing one another doesn't mean it wasn't a missed opportunity to never do so. It would have been another interesting chapter to both men's careers.

Can't find a movie or TV show? Login to create it.

Global

s focus the search bar
p open profile menu
esc close an open window
? open keyboard shortcut window

On media pages

b go back (or to parent when applicable)
e go to edit page

On TV season pages

(right arrow) go to next season
(left arrow) go to previous season

On TV episode pages

(right arrow) go to next episode
(left arrow) go to previous episode

On all image pages

a open add image window

On all edit pages

t open translation selector
ctrl+ s submit form

On discussion pages

n create new discussion
w toggle watching status
p toggle public/private
c toggle close/open
a open activity
r reply to discussion
l go to last reply
ctrl+ enter submit your message
(right arrow) next page
(left arrow) previous page

Settings

Want to rate or add this item to a list?

Login