The strange being in Star Trek 5 was a real loser of an idea. Not even fun to speculate about what it actually was. I think I read when they were planning this sequel they thought the film would have no real story if the weird being did not turn out to be the actual Almighty! Guess the film had no story!

You know one fan had an idea that most of Star Trek 5 was something Kirk made up while he and McCoy and Spock sat around the campfire both early in this movie and at the end of it. The fan wanted to end the story with Spock saying something like "That's an intriguing story Captain. Unfortunately, I have no brother." It is not my theory --how does it grab any of you?

I guess when watching Star Trek you actually will have to use imagination a little. I will give an analogy.

In the highly left-wing Mash series all the men and women have what look 70's hairdos. This was pretty much the case on Hogan's Heroes as well. Now, you could just ignore what hairdos you are actually seeing and pretend they all have 40's and 50's hairdos.

Now back to Star Trek. When McCoy saw the deity-like being we could imagine that McCoy was shown more incredible stuff than we the audience see. And that is why he was so impressed with it.

PS Speaking of Mash and Hogan's Heroes. They were made by many of the same people.

Septuagint is one of the best Bibles to read.

The Septuagint is, again, where reptiles are created by God before man!

@Nexus71 said:

Really mate promoting a book on the "science" of the Bible on the site of a SF franchise that has been known always to promote rational thought and (factual) science above religion seems a lost cause to me. Sorry but your preaching for the wrong parish here man.

For God's Sake, Nex. He is a TROLL. Ignore him.

I will not respond directly to Jet. I told him on the Mash board. But to the rest of you. I am not trolling!

Look everyone. Theories abound. Creation of universe with something like quantum mechanics is mere theory. The Bible OTOH has more science than one could count without a computer. Read Book of Jeremiah find the leopard can't change spots reference. For only one example. The Bible is more accurate than anything in the world in the most important of ways. The way the Earth was created is credible in the Bible. You do not hear silly stories about, say, a huge goat that chewed a bunch of stars, then spit it all out and there was the Earth! You hear how the Being outside science (as we know it) took the Earth that just had lifeless water and began creating light. How that Being later made vegetation. How that Being still later made sea animals and reptiles. Then land animals and finally man! All in harmony with science. Now most people thought tremendously this dull TNG was as boring as one could possibly get but that at least it had nice enough scruples. Actually no it does not. It wrongly equated atheism with progress. It's indeed a total dread for want of excitement, interest and scruples!

@Benton12 said:

I will not respond directly to Jet.

Can I get that in writing? Notarized?

Comfort's book that I have already mentioned is excellent and accurate and speaks volumes. No trolling am I doing!

Proof I am not trolling is that my statements are laced with accuracy. From the Soviets taking out some Cuban missiles without John Kennedy's knowledge to Mad Magazine calling TNG very boring to the great Bible-located scientific accuracies like round Earth. I do not troll!

Well Invidia I was thinking about the Membrane theory but also of the Inflation theory and more exotic theories trying to explain the Big Bang I've seen a program of BBC's Horizon where all these theories were investigated and what was the right theory but it's all very high grade physics,maths,,astrophysics and particle physics stuff that goes way over my head and for like 99,9% of the people.But the horizon program tried to explain it in a 101 sense and some has stuck although don't ask me about the maths because that would be like ancient Greek to me.

Jetfire wrote; Can I get that in writing? Notarized?

Yeah same here can I get that in writing as well?

This is retarded, Invidia. It is all just theories! No one had proven there is a single universe elsewhere to say nothing about proving how the universes was created without something outside of nature! Retarded!

Invidia, a couple of these same scientists 18 years ago thought we had 100,000 genes in Our cells later modified to around 23,000. Just theories about other universes, nothing more.

Invidia, a couple of these same scientists 18 years ago thought we had 100,000 genes in Our cells later modified to around 23,000. Just theories about other universes, nothing more.